Dawners Report - Inas by ipuppy | World Anvil Manuscripts | World Anvil
Following

Table of Contents

Report 1

In the world of Eandester

Visit Eandester

Ongoing 557 Words

Report 1

65 0 0

Performance Review for Inas, DAWNER DB-01

Overall Performance:

Inas, while showing potential in combat and tactical thinking, demonstrates concerning behavior and lacks cohesion within the party. There are instances of questionable judgment, moral ambiguity, and a lack of empathy, which need to be addressed for future missions.

 

Strengths:

  1. Tactical Thinking: Inas has shown potential in suggesting new combat approaches, indicating a willingness to adapt and strategize.
  2. Combat Skills: Demonstrates impressive lightning abilities, possibly indicating a barbarian lineage.
  3. Avoidance of Collateral Damage: Generally succeeds in avoiding collateral damage during missions, showing consideration for bystanders.
  4. Quick Decision Making: Displays quick thinking in various situations, though sometimes resorts to dishonesty as a solution.

 

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Lack of Empathy: Shows a concerning lack of empathy, especially after causing harm or destruction, such as setting someone's house on fire.
  2. Moral Ambiguity: Engages in questionable actions like defiling a corpse and spiritual desecration, raising integrity concerns.
  3. Cohesion within the Party: Lacks group cohesion and demonstrates a tendency to gossip, which undermines teamwork and trust among party members.
  4. Judgment: Often makes impulsive decisions without considering the consequences, leading to questionable outcomes and compromising the mission's success.
  5. Focus and Motivation: Shows a strange focus on unrelated matters, such as tiger lilies, during critical situations, indicating a lack of focus and varying motivations.
  6. Surrendering Agency: Appears to give up agency to unstable individuals within the party, leading to chaotic situations and compromising mission objectives.

 

Recommendations:

  1. Leadership Training: Inas should undergo leadership training to improve decision-making skills and foster better group cohesion.
  2. Moral and Ethical Guidance: Requires guidance on moral and ethical conduct to address integrity concerns and make more empathetic decisions.
  3. Team Building Exercises: Participation in team-building exercises to enhance collaboration and trust among party members.
  4. Critical Thinking Development: Encouragement to develop critical thinking skills to consider the long-term consequences of actions before making decisions.

 

Conclusion:

While Inas shows promise as a Knight of the Sun, there are significant areas for improvement in judgment, empathy, and teamwork that need to be addressed for successful future missions. Continued mentorship and training are recommended to cultivate a well-rounded and effective member of the Knights of the Sun.

 
 
 
 

Unedited Observations: 

  • "Maybe we just don’t attack them out of nowhere” - a new combat approach?
  • “I would be too” - attacking people unawares
  • Knight - potential head trauma
  • Admonished to avoid collateral damage - generally succeeded
  • Head trauma may be more extensive throughout the party
  • Willfully expose innocents to unknown peril - Fawn
  • Bard may not be completely useless, leading party to hag
  • Decimation of a town is a point of humor (!)
  • “I told you that she was fine” - no real group cohesion, since “they destroyed it”.
  • “Thinking it was necessary to attack the hag” - Inas
  • “Fooled a few times”
  • “The one we killed twice” - another hag
  • Candidate seems very quick to resort to dishonesty as a way out of their jam. Integrity in question.
  • Recent events include defiling a corpse - and spiritual desecration
  • Candidate instantly goes to gossip
  • Lacks empathy after having set someone’s house on fire
  • Strange focus on tiger lilies after having kicked off the apocalypse.
  • Wildly varying motivations
  • “The clusterfuck” that has ensued
  • Candidate has given up their agency to a group of questionably stable individuals.
  • Judgment is in question. - repeatedly
Please Login in order to comment!